KPMG Analyst Interview Questions & Experience Guide

Interview Preparation
,
261

Company Name: KPMG

Position: Analyst

Application Process: I applied through the company’s career portal after seeing the job posting online. The process was straightforward, and I received a response within a couple of weeks.

Interview Rounds:

  • Round 1 - Technical Interview:

    • Questions Asked: The interviewer asked about recent trends in the industry, my understanding of the role, and how I would approach solving a real-world problem related to the position. It was more of a candid discussion rather than a textbook Q&A.
    • Your Approach: I focused on staying updated with recent industry trends and tried to relate my knowledge to practical scenarios. I also emphasized my problem-solving skills and how I could contribute to the team.
    • Outcome: Passed this round and moved to the next stage.

  • Round 2 - Conversational Interview:

    • Questions Asked: This round felt more like a casual conversation. The interviewer asked about my background, interests, and how I handle teamwork and challenges.
    • Your Approach: I kept the tone friendly and professional, sharing personal anecdotes to highlight my skills and experiences. I also asked questions about the company culture and team dynamics.
    • Outcome: Successfully cleared this round and received a positive response.

Preparation Tips:

  • Stay updated with recent trends in the industry.
  • Practice explaining technical concepts in a simple, conversational manner.
  • Be prepared to discuss your experiences and how they relate to the role.

Conclusion:
Overall, the interview process was smooth and engaging. The conversational nature of the interviews made it less stressful. I would advise future candidates to focus on being genuine and prepared to discuss both technical and non-technical aspects of the role. Good luck!

262

Company Name: KPMG

Position: Analyst

Application Process: Applied through campus placement. The process included an aptitude test, followed by a group discussion (GD), and then two rounds of interviews.

Interview Rounds:

  • Round 1 - Aptitude Test:

  • Questions Asked: General aptitude questions covering quantitative ability, logical reasoning, and verbal skills.

  • Your Approach: Focused on time management and accuracy, as the test was timed. Prioritized questions I was confident about first.

  • Outcome: Cleared the round successfully.

  • Round 2 - Group Discussion (GD):

  • Questions Asked: Topic was related to a current business scenario.

  • Your Approach: Tried to contribute meaningfully without dominating the discussion. Listened actively and built on others’ points.

  • Outcome: Selected for the next round.

  • Round 3 - Technical & Aptitude Interview:

  • Questions Asked: Mix of technical questions (basic concepts related to the role) and aptitude-based puzzles.

  • Your Approach: Answered technical questions confidently and took a structured approach to solve the puzzles.

  • Outcome: Advanced to the final round.

  • Round 4 - Final Interview (Senior Employee):

  • Questions Asked: General questions about my background, interests, and why I wanted to join KPMG.

  • Your Approach: Stayed professional and tried to engage the interviewer, though they seemed disinterested.

  • Outcome: Felt the round didn’t go as well as expected due to the interviewer’s lack of engagement.

Preparation Tips:

  • Practice aptitude tests regularly to improve speed and accuracy.
  • For GD, stay updated on current affairs and practice speaking concisely.
  • Brush up on basic technical concepts relevant to the role.

Conclusion:
Overall, the process was smooth, but the final interview was a bit disappointing due to the interviewer’s disinterest. I could have prepared better for the technical round by revising core concepts more thoroughly. For future candidates, I’d recommend staying calm and confident throughout the process, even if the interviewer seems uninterested.

263

Company Name: KPMG

Position: Analyst

Application Process: The application process involved an aptitude test followed by a subjective core test and an interview. The interview primarily focused on discussing the answers submitted in the test.

Interview Rounds:

  • Round 1 - Aptitude Test:

  • Questions Asked: General aptitude questions covering quantitative, logical, and verbal reasoning.

  • Your Approach: I practiced previous aptitude test papers and focused on time management to ensure I could answer all questions within the allotted time.

  • Outcome: Cleared the round successfully.

  • Round 2 - Subjective Core Test:

  • Questions Asked: Questions related to core subjects relevant to the role, such as accounting, finance, or business analysis (depending on the candidate’s background).

  • Your Approach: I reviewed key concepts from my coursework and ensured I understood the fundamentals to answer the questions accurately.

  • Outcome: Passed this round and moved to the interview stage.

  • Round 3 - Interview:

  • Questions Asked: The interviewer asked for detailed explanations of the answers I had provided in the subjective core test. They also inquired about my thought process and reasoning behind certain answers.

  • Your Approach: I remained calm and articulated my reasoning clearly, ensuring I could justify my answers with logical explanations.

  • Outcome: The interviewer seemed satisfied with my responses, and I was selected for the role.

Preparation Tips:

  • Practice aptitude tests regularly to improve speed and accuracy.
  • Revise core subjects thoroughly, especially topics relevant to the role.
  • Be prepared to explain your answers in detail during the interview.

Conclusion:
Overall, the interview process was structured and focused on assessing both technical knowledge and problem-solving skills. Practicing beforehand and staying confident during the interview were key to my success. For future candidates, I’d recommend thorough preparation and clarity in explaining your thought process.

264

Company Name: KPMG

Position: Analyst

Application Process: Applied through campus placement.

Interview Rounds:

  • Round 1 - General Interview:
    • Questions Asked: The interview was very brief (less than 5 minutes) and didn’t delve into college background or job specifics. The questions were general in nature.
    • Your Approach: I tried to stay composed and answer the general questions as best as I could, but the brevity of the interview made it difficult to showcase my skills or experience.
    • Outcome: The interview ended abruptly, and I didn’t progress further in the process.

Conclusion:
The experience was quite disappointing due to the extremely short duration of the interview. It felt unfair to be judged on such a brief interaction. For future candidates, I’d advise preparing for general questions but also being ready for a quick, unpredictable interview format.

265

Company Name: KPMG

Position: Analyst

Location: [Not specified]

Application Process: [Not specified]

Interview Rounds:

  • Round 1 - Interview:
  • Questions Asked: The interview was laid back and friendly, focusing on general fit and experience.
  • Your Approach: I tried to keep the conversation professional yet relaxed, aligning my responses with the company’s values and the role’s requirements.
  • Outcome: The interview went well, but the pay offered was very low, and there was no room for negotiation.

Conclusion:

Overall, the interview experience with KPMG was positive, with a friendly atmosphere. However, the compensation was disappointing, especially given the experience required and the firm’s global standing. For future candidates, it might be worth preparing to discuss salary expectations early in the process to avoid surprises later.

266

Company Name: KPMG

Position: Analyst

Application Process: The selection process took place in September 2019. It involved three rounds: a written test, a group discussion, and a personal interview.

Interview Rounds:

  • Round 1 - Written Test:

    • Questions Asked: The test included aptitude questions and psychometric-type questions.
    • Your Approach: I focused on solving the aptitude questions quickly and accurately, while also ensuring I answered the psychometric questions honestly.
    • Outcome: I cleared this round and moved on to the next stage.

  • Round 2 - Group Discussion:

    • Questions Asked: The topic for the group discussion was based on recent events or trending topics.
    • Your Approach: I actively participated, shared my views clearly, and listened to others to build on their points.
    • Outcome: My performance was satisfactory, and I advanced to the final round.

  • Round 3 - Personal Interview:

    • Questions Asked: The interview covered a mix of technical and behavioral questions, though the specifics weren’t provided.
    • Your Approach: I answered confidently, backed my responses with examples, and ensured I communicated clearly.
    • Outcome: I successfully cleared this round and was selected for the role.

Preparation Tips:

  • For aptitude tests, practice speed and accuracy using standard resources.
  • Stay updated on current affairs for group discussions.
  • For interviews, prepare both technical and behavioral questions, and practice articulating your thoughts clearly.

Conclusion:
The overall experience was smooth, and the rounds were well-structured. I would advise future candidates to stay calm, be confident, and prepare thoroughly for each stage of the process.

267

Company Name: KPMG

Position: Analyst

Application Process: The application process was well-organized and quick. It involved multiple rounds, including a phone interview, a skills test, and a final interview with the manager. The HR team was responsive and helpful throughout, making the entire process smooth.

Interview Rounds:

  • Round 1 - Phone Interview:

    • Questions Asked: General questions about my background, interest in the role, and basic situational scenarios.
    • Your Approach: I focused on being concise and clear, highlighting my relevant skills and experiences. I also made sure to align my answers with the company’s values.
    • Outcome: Passed this round and moved on to the next stage.

  • Round 2 - Skills Test:

    • Questions Asked: The test included analytical and problem-solving questions, as well as some role-specific tasks.
    • Your Approach: I took my time to read each question carefully and applied logical reasoning to solve the problems. For role-specific tasks, I relied on my prior knowledge and experience.
    • Outcome: Successfully cleared the test and advanced to the final round.

  • Round 3 - Final Interview with Manager:

    • Questions Asked: More in-depth questions about my technical skills, problem-solving abilities, and how I would handle specific job-related scenarios. There were also behavioral questions to assess cultural fit.
    • Your Approach: I provided detailed examples from my past experiences to demonstrate my skills. For behavioral questions, I used the STAR method to structure my answers.
    • Outcome: Received positive feedback and was selected for the role.

Preparation Tips:

  • Brush up on analytical and problem-solving skills, as they are crucial for the role.
  • Practice situational and behavioral questions using the STAR method.
  • Research the company’s values and culture to align your answers accordingly.

Conclusion:
Overall, the interview process at KPMG was smooth and well-structured. The HR team was supportive, and the rounds were designed to assess both technical and cultural fit. Preparing thoroughly and staying calm during the interviews helped me perform well. For future candidates, I’d recommend practicing problem-solving and behavioral questions in advance and being yourself during the interviews.

268

Company Name: KPMG

Position: Analyst

Application Process: The application was submitted through the company’s career portal after attending a campus recruitment drive.

Interview Rounds:

  • Round 1 - Manager Interview:

  • Questions Asked:

    • General accounting concepts.
    • Differences between IFRS and US GAAP.
    • Basic Excel functionalities and hands-on tasks.

  • Your Approach: I revised my accounting syllabus thoroughly, focusing on IFRS and US GAAP differences. For Excel, I practiced common functions like VLOOKUP, pivot tables, and basic formulas.

  • Outcome: Cleared the round with positive feedback on my accounting knowledge.

  • Round 2 - Director Interview:

  • Questions Asked:

    • Deeper questions on IFRS and US GAAP.
    • Scenario-based accounting problems.
    • Advanced Excel tasks, including data analysis.

  • Your Approach: I focused on applying theoretical knowledge to practical scenarios. For Excel, I ensured I was comfortable with data analysis tools and shortcuts.

  • Outcome: Successfully cleared the round, with the director appreciating my problem-solving approach.

Preparation Tips:

  • Revise core accounting concepts, especially IFRS and US GAAP.
  • Practice Excel regularly, focusing on functions used in financial analysis.
  • Be prepared to explain your thought process for scenario-based questions.

Conclusion:
The interview process was smooth, and the questions were aligned with the role’s requirements. I could have practiced more advanced Excel functions beforehand, but overall, it was a great learning experience. For future candidates, I’d recommend focusing on both theoretical and practical aspects of accounting and Excel.

269

Company Name: KPMG

Position: Analyst

Application Process: The application process began with an aptitude test. Candidates who cleared this test proceeded to the group discussion round. After successfully clearing the group discussion, the final round was an HR interview conducted by two panelists.

Interview Rounds:

  • Round 1 - Aptitude Test:

  • Questions Asked: The test included quantitative aptitude, logical reasoning, and verbal ability questions.

  • Your Approach: I focused on time management, ensuring I attempted all sections within the allotted time. I prioritized questions I was confident about and revisited the tougher ones later.

  • Outcome: Cleared the round and moved to the next stage.

  • Round 2 - Group Discussion:

  • Questions Asked: The topic was a general business scenario, and we were expected to discuss it collaboratively.

  • Your Approach: I actively participated, listened to others, and contributed relevant points while maintaining a respectful tone. I also ensured the discussion stayed on track.

  • Outcome: Successfully cleared the group discussion round.

  • Round 3 - HR Interview:

  • Questions Asked: Basic HR questions were asked, such as “Tell me about yourself,” “Why KPMG?” and “Describe your projects.”

  • Your Approach: I kept my answers concise and aligned them with the role of an Analyst. I highlighted my relevant projects and skills.

  • Outcome: The interviewers seemed satisfied with my responses.

Preparation Tips:

  • For the aptitude test, practice quantitative and logical reasoning questions from standard resources.
  • For group discussions, stay updated on current business trends and practice speaking clearly and confidently.
  • For the HR round, prepare a clear and concise introduction and be ready to discuss your projects in detail.

Conclusion:
The overall experience was smooth and well-structured. I felt the group discussion was the most challenging part, but active participation and clarity of thought helped me clear it. For future candidates, I’d recommend thorough preparation for each round and staying calm during the process.

270

Company Name: KPMG

Position: Analyst

Location: [Location not specified]

Application Process: The application process involved being shortlisted based on quantitative skills, followed by technical and HR interviews.

Interview Rounds:

  • Round 1 - Shortlisting (Quantitative Assessment):

  • Questions Asked: The round focused on quantitative skills, though specific questions were not detailed.

  • Your Approach: Prepared by brushing up on basic quantitative concepts and problem-solving techniques.

  • Outcome: Successfully shortlisted for the next round.

  • Round 2 - Technical Interview:

  • Questions Asked: Questions were based on the resume, with a focus on networking topics.

  • Your Approach: Reviewed networking fundamentals and ensured familiarity with all resume points to answer confidently.

  • Outcome: Cleared the technical round and moved to the final HR interview.

  • Round 3 - HR Interview:

  • Questions Asked: The interviewer asked for the full form of KPMG, its headquarters location, and explained the compensation package.

  • Your Approach: Researched the company beforehand to answer general knowledge questions and listened attentively to the package details.

  • Outcome: The interview went well, and the outcome was positive.

Preparation Tips:

  • Focus on quantitative skills for the initial shortlisting.
  • Revise networking topics if they are part of your resume.
  • Research the company, including its full form and headquarters, to prepare for HR questions.

Conclusion:
The overall experience was smooth and well-structured. Preparing for quantitative skills and technical topics helped, and researching the company beforehand made the HR round easier. Future candidates should ensure they are thorough with their resume details and basic company information.

271

Company Name: KPMG

Position: Analyst

Location: Not specified

Application Process: Not specified

Interview Rounds:

  • Round 1 - Interview:
  • Questions Asked: The interview was professional, and the interviewers were friendly. Specific questions were not mentioned.
  • Your Approach: The candidate found the experience positive and engaging.
  • Outcome: The candidate enjoyed the process and would recommend interviewing at KPMG.

Conclusion:

The overall interview experience at KPMG was good. The interviewers were professional and friendly, making the process enjoyable. The candidate recommends giving it a try but leaves the final decision to others.

272

Company Name: KPMG

Position: Analyst

Application Process: The application process was smooth, and I felt confident throughout. I was clear about my strengths and weaknesses when answering the questions.

Interview Rounds:

  • Round 1 - General Interview:
    • Questions Asked: The questions were focused on my strengths, weaknesses, and how I handle challenges.
    • Your Approach: I answered honestly, highlighting my strengths and acknowledging areas for improvement. I also provided examples to support my answers.
    • Outcome: I passed this round and moved forward in the process.

Conclusion:
Overall, the interview experience with KPMG was positive. Being prepared and self-aware helped me navigate the questions confidently. For future candidates, I’d recommend knowing your strengths and weaknesses well and being ready to discuss them with examples.

273

Company Name: KPMG

Position: Analyst

Location: [Location not specified]

Application Process: [Application process details not provided]

Interview Rounds:

  • Round 1 - General Interaction:
    • Questions Asked: The interviewers were easygoing and understanding, focusing on making candidates comfortable. They emphasized the importance of submitting quality work and allowed candidates to take their time.
    • Your Approach: I focused on staying calm and composed, ensuring that I understood the requirements before responding or completing tasks.
    • Outcome: The round was positive, and the interviewers were supportive of my approach.

Preparation Tips:

  • Focus on understanding the role and the company culture.
  • Practice staying calm under pressure and take your time to deliver quality responses.

Conclusion:
The overall experience was very positive, with the interviewers being supportive and encouraging. I would advise future candidates to relax, be themselves, and prioritize quality over speed in their responses.

274

Company Name: KPMG

Position: Analyst

Location: On-campus

Application Process: Applied through on-campus placement process.

Interview Rounds:

  • Round 1 - On-campus Interview:

  • Questions Asked: Basic questions about my background, skills, and interest in the role. The interviewers were two different people, and the questions were standard for an entry-level position.

  • Your Approach: I kept my answers concise and focused on my relevant skills and experiences. I also made sure to highlight my enthusiasm for the role and the company.

  • Outcome: Passed the round and received the offer for the Analyst position.

Preparation Tips:

  • Brush up on basic interview questions related to your resume and the role.
  • Research the company to understand its values and work culture.
  • Practice speaking clearly and confidently.

Conclusion:
The interview was straightforward and well-organized. I felt prepared, and the interviewers were friendly. For future candidates, I’d recommend staying calm and being yourself—it’s okay to take a moment to think before answering.

275

Company Name: KPMG

Position: Analyst

Location: India

Application Process: Applied through campus placement.

Interview Rounds:

  • Round 1 - Case Study Interview:
  • Questions Asked: The interviewer asked questions based on different case studies. The focus was on analytical and problem-solving skills.
  • Your Approach: I tried to structure my answers logically, breaking down the case studies into smaller parts to analyze them thoroughly. I also made sure to communicate my thought process clearly.
  • Outcome: The interviewer was polite and seemed satisfied with my responses. I received a positive response within one day.

Preparation Tips:

  • Practice solving case studies to improve analytical thinking.
  • Work on structuring your answers clearly and logically.
  • Brush up on industry trends and common business scenarios.

Conclusion:
The interview experience with KPMG was crisp and detail-oriented. The interviewer was professional and made the process smooth. Being one of the big four companies in India, the expectations were high, but the preparation paid off. For future candidates, I’d recommend focusing on case studies and practicing clear communication.

276

Company Name: KPMG

Position: Analyst

Location: [Location not specified]

Application Process: [Application process details not provided]

Interview Rounds:

  • Round 1 - Technical Interview:

  • Questions Asked:

    • Basics of Python (e.g., mutable objects, data structures).
    • SQL concepts like normalization.

  • Your Approach:

    • Answered the questions confidently, explaining concepts clearly.
    • Provided examples where applicable to illustrate understanding.

  • Outcome:

    • The interviewer was friendly, and the round went well.

Preparation Tips:

  • Brush up on fundamental Python concepts, especially mutable vs. immutable objects and common data structures.
  • Review SQL basics, including normalization and queries.
  • Practice explaining concepts clearly and concisely.

Conclusion:
The interview was a positive experience, and the interviewer made the process comfortable. Focusing on core technical concepts and clear communication helped. For future candidates, ensure you’re well-prepared on the basics and can articulate your thoughts effectively.

277

Company Name: KPMG

Position: Analyst

Application Process: The recruitment process included an aptitude/psychometric test, a group discussion, and two rounds of interviews. I applied through the campus placement drive.

Interview Rounds:

  • Round 1 - Aptitude/Psychometric Test:

  • Questions Asked: The test was relatively easy, covering basic aptitude and psychometric questions.

  • Your Approach: I brushed up on my quantitative and logical reasoning skills beforehand and stayed calm during the test.

  • Outcome: Cleared this round successfully.

  • Round 2 - Group Discussion (GD):

  • Questions Asked: The topic was based on a general business or management concept related to current happenings.

  • Your Approach: I made sure to listen actively, contribute relevant points, and maintain a balanced participation without dominating the discussion.

  • Outcome: Advanced to the next round.

  • Round 3 - Technical/HR Interview:

  • Questions Asked: A mix of technical questions related to my field and some HR questions about my background and motivation for joining KPMG.

  • Your Approach: I prepared by revising core concepts and practiced answering behavioral questions. I also researched KPMG’s work culture and values.

  • Outcome: Cleared this round and moved to the final interview.

  • Round 4 - Final Interview:

  • Questions Asked: More in-depth technical questions and situational scenarios to assess problem-solving skills.

  • Your Approach: I focused on structuring my answers clearly and provided examples from past experiences to showcase my skills.

  • Outcome: Received positive feedback and was selected for the Analyst role.

Preparation Tips:

  • For aptitude tests, practice basic quantitative and logical reasoning questions.
  • For GD, stay updated on current business and management trends and practice speaking concisely.
  • For interviews, revise core technical concepts and prepare for behavioral questions using the STAR method.

Conclusion:
Overall, the process was smooth and well-structured. I felt well-prepared, but I could have practiced more situational questions for the final interview. My advice to future candidates is to stay calm, be confident, and thoroughly research the company’s values and recent projects.

278

Company Name: KPMG

Position: Analyst

Application Process: The application process was a two-step one. It began with an initial screening, followed by an interview with the senior manager of the team. The process was quick and efficient, and I received an offer within two weeks.

Interview Rounds:

  • Round 1 - Initial Screening:

  • Questions Asked: General questions about my background, skills, and interest in the role.

  • Your Approach: I kept my answers concise and focused on highlighting my relevant experience and enthusiasm for the position.

  • Outcome: Passed the screening and moved to the next round.

  • Round 2 - Senior Manager Interview:

  • Questions Asked: More in-depth questions about my technical skills, problem-solving abilities, and how I would handle specific scenarios related to the role.

  • Your Approach: I provided structured answers using the STAR method (Situation, Task, Action, Result) to demonstrate my capabilities clearly.

  • Outcome: Successfully cleared the round and received the offer.

Conclusion:

The entire process was smooth and well-organized. I appreciated the efficiency and clarity at each stage. For future candidates, I’d recommend preparing thoroughly for behavioral and scenario-based questions, as they play a significant role in the interview process.

279

Company Name: KPMG

Position: Analyst

Location: [Location not specified]

Application Process: [Details not provided]

Interview Rounds:

  • Round 1 - General Interview:

    • Questions Asked: [Specific questions not provided]
    • Your Approach: [Candidate’s approach not detailed]
    • Outcome: Positive feedback; the interviewers were friendly and informative.

  • Round 2 - [Round Type not specified]:

    • Questions Asked: [Specific questions not provided]
    • Your Approach: [Candidate’s approach not detailed]
    • Outcome: Continued positive experience; the process was smooth and professional.

Conclusion:

The overall experience with KPMG was very positive. The interviewers were welcoming and provided a lot of useful information about the role and the company culture. It seems like a great place to work, and the process was well-structured. If I could do anything differently, I might prepare more specific examples to highlight my skills, but overall, it was a solid experience.

280

Company Name: KPMG

Position: Analyst

Application Process: The interview process was very smooth and comfortable. The interviewer was very humble and polite. I was given an assignment to write a report regarding a certain event. The data was provided by the interviewer itself.

Interview Rounds:

  • Round 1 - Assignment Submission:
  • Task Given: Write a report about a specific event using the provided data.
  • Your Approach: I carefully analyzed the data, structured the report logically, and ensured clarity and coherence in my writing.
  • Outcome: The interviewer appreciated my report and moved me forward in the process.

Conclusion:
Overall, the experience was positive and straightforward. The interviewer’s supportive demeanor made the process less stressful. For future candidates, I’d advise focusing on clarity and structure when handling written assignments, as they seem to value well-organized and concise communication.