Democratic leadership style is mostly common with HR personnel and professionals preferring a participative management style. From the company’s perspective, this leadership style emphasizes that the management encourages the power distribution by asking both the managers and employees to actively take part in decision-making processes.
Pros of Democratic Leadership Style
1. Its applicable for almost every business
Solutions that are acquired on the basis of democratic approach tend to last long, provided they are revised periodically. As the style facilitates a healthy engagement among the team members, some popular processes that are mutual in most companies are properly maintained. According to writer and who offer [thesis writing help] said that the team members are promoted to work in a unified manner with others in the company.
2. Its problem solving ability for complex issues
Leaders who acquire democratic style are well-known to be excellent problems tacklers of particularly complex issues. The style empowers them to work collaboratively with others on the basis of consensus and acknowledge the issues accordingly. The leaders ask the team members to come up with innovative solutions in order to examine the strategic and critical issues from various aspects.
3. It encourages a creative environment
The democratic leadership style is popularly known to strive for creative workarounds and innovative input from the designated employees. In short, this leadership style is particularly preferred for creative individuals who need to think out-of-the-box and deliver a master design.
4. Strong connectivity between team members
Employees under this leadership style tend to become supportive and closely connected with each other. Collaboration is appreciated, and everyone’s opinions are taken into account.
Cons of Democratic Leadership Style
1. It becomes regretful
In this leadership style, the foremost benefit can also become the biggest drawback. The style creates an environment where every individual might expect their input to be valued and implemented. In reality, only a few selected ones could be implemented from a large pool of opinions and recommendations, making the leaders spend more than ample time apologizing individuals whose ideas were not considered in the game plan.
2. It eats more than affordable time
The consensus approach often leads to procrastination, leading the management to find it difficult of working within the allowed framework and timeline. Hence, a bad choice in case of time sensitive or urgent deliveries.
3. Processing decisions is time-consuming
Quite an extension of the last point, it’s obvious when management is to listen to a large number of people, the decision-making process is only going to get indefinitely delayed. Furthermore, integrating all the ideas at a single platform and then analyzing the applicability of each is going to require some real patience and intelligent brains.
4. The element of uncertainty
Leaders deploying democratic leadership style sometimes tend to misfire or become inconclusive, especially in critical situations requiring immediate responses. Such managers and leaders would fail disastrously in situations demanding more of an authoritarian handling.