The following answer is from the perspective of a candidate who had applied for both the companies, and he is sharing the experience of his friends:
The following points are common in both the companies:
- They are all service-based businesses, which means they primarily provide IT and consulting services to other companies.
- They all include onsite opportunities, which means you’ll be sent to the client’s location based on your project and experience.
- The workload is determined by deadlines; the closer the deadline, the more work is required.
- There may be no work for months at a period, which can be detrimental to persons just starting out in their professions.
- Salaries and perks, as well as the work culture, are all comparable.
- Getting into good projects is often a matter of luck and office politics. The shift times are the same.
- You’ll primarily be working with obsolete technology that offers little to no benefit.
The following points are exclusive to LTI and its USP:
- There is less bossing with a horizontal hierarchy.
- Medical insurance is insufficient to cover a significant health problem.
- People with more than 4–4 years of experience are more likely to be offered onsite possibilities.
- Most delivery managers deceive you into believing that the project work is good, but in reality, it is only the support work.
- There are some excellent projects, but admission to them is only attainable if you are incredibly fortunate.
- Freshers are frequently treated with suspicion by HR.
- Employees have access to many free online courses, which can be beneficial to those who wish to self-learn new technologies. Two years of service for 2 lakh INR is simply too much.
- Because it is a French company, the work culture will differ from the other companies you mentioned.
- It excels in consulting rather than IT services.
- The onsite opportunities are excellent.
Based on the above comparisons you can select which company is better for you.