Lenskart Product Manager Interview Questions & Experience Guide

Interview Preparation
,
1

Lenskart Product Manager Interview Questions & Experience Guide

2

Company Name: Lenskart

Position: Product Manager

Location: [Not specified]

Application Process: Applied via campus placement at Indian Institute of Management (IIM), Lucknow.

Interview Rounds:

  • Round 1 - Case Study Round:

    • Questions Asked: Case submission.
    • Your Approach: Prepared a structured case analysis based on the given problem. Focused on identifying key issues, proposing solutions, and justifying recommendations.
    • Outcome: Successfully cleared the round.

  • Round 2 - Guesstimates Round:

    • Questions Asked:
      • Q1. Tell me about yourself.
    • Your Approach: Provided a concise summary of my background, highlighting relevant experiences and skills. Also, demonstrated my ability to approach guesstimates logically.
    • Outcome: Cleared the round.

Preparation Tips:

  • Interactions with seniors.
  • Internet research.
  • Online material for case analysis.
  • Be thorough about your past experience and achievements.
  • Should know how to approach Guesstimates.

Conclusion:
Overall, the interview process was smooth and well-structured. The case study round tested analytical skills, while the guesstimates round focused on problem-solving and communication. Preparing with the right resources and practicing case studies and guesstimates beforehand helped a lot. For future candidates, I’d recommend focusing on these areas and being confident in your responses.

3

Company Name: Lenskart

Position: Product Manager

Application Process: The application process was straightforward. I applied online through the company’s career portal.

Interview Rounds:

  • Round 1 - Technical Round:
    • Questions Asked:
      • Q1. What is your favorite product, and what metrics would you track for it?
    • Your Approach:
      • I chose a product I was passionate about and explained why it stood out to me. For metrics, I focused on key performance indicators like user engagement, retention, and conversion rates, linking them to business goals.
    • Outcome:
      • The interviewer seemed satisfied with my response, and I passed this round.

Preparation Tips:

  • Brush up on product management fundamentals, especially metrics and KPIs.
  • Practice articulating your thoughts clearly and concisely.
  • Be prepared to discuss real-world products you admire and how you would improve them.

Conclusion:
Overall, the interview was a great learning experience. I felt confident in my answers, but I could have delved deeper into the competitive landscape of the product I discussed. My advice to future candidates is to thoroughly research the company’s products and be ready to think critically about them.

4

Company Name: Lenskart

Position: Product Manager

Location: [Not specified]

Application Process: Applied via campus placement in December 2021.

Interview Rounds:

  • Round 1 - Resume Shortlist:

  • Questions Asked: N/A (Resume screening round)

  • Your Approach: Ensured my resume was concise and highlighted relevant skills and experiences.

  • Outcome: Successfully shortlisted for the next round.

  • Round 2 - Case Study:

  • Questions Asked: Design case study (specifics not provided).

  • Your Approach: Thought through the problem for 30 seconds to a minute before structuring my answer. Focused on a logical and user-centric approach.

  • Outcome: Advanced to the next round.

  • Round 3 - One-on-one Round:

  • Questions Asked:

    1. Behavioural and case study questions.
    2. “What is your favorite product, and how would you improve it?”

  • Your Approach: For the behavioral question, used the STAR method. For the product improvement question, analyzed the product from a user perspective and suggested actionable improvements.

  • Outcome: [Not specified]

Preparation Tips:

  • Maintain your calm and composure during interviews.
  • For case studies, take 30 seconds to a minute to think through your approach before answering.

Conclusion:
The interview process was structured and focused on problem-solving and product thinking. Taking a moment to organize my thoughts before answering case study questions was helpful. Future candidates should focus on clarity and user-centric solutions.

5

Company Name: Lenskart

Position: Product Manager

Location: [Location not specified]

Application Process: [Application process details not provided]

Interview Rounds:

  • Round 1 - One-on-one Round:
    • Questions Asked:
      1. How would you reduce returns?
      2. How would you increase the Average Order Value (AOV) of Zomato?
      3. How would you identify why sellers are dropping in the listing process?
    • Your Approach: [Candidate’s approach not provided]
    • Outcome: [Result of this round not provided]

Preparation Tips:
[No preparation tips provided]

Conclusion:
[No conclusion provided]

6

Company Name: Lenskart

Position: Product Manager

Application Process: Applied through an online portal.

Interview Rounds:

  • Round 1 - Product Case Interview:
    • Questions Asked: The interviewer presented a product use case and expected a specific answer aligned with their own thoughts. No flexibility was allowed for alternative approaches or discussions.
    • Your Approach: Attempted to explore different angles and solutions for the use case, but the interviewer was rigid in their expectations.
    • Outcome: The round lasted only 18 minutes, and the process felt inadequate for judging a Product Manager role.

Conclusion:
The overall experience was disappointing due to the lack of open discussion or flexibility in evaluating problem-solving skills. For future candidates, be prepared for a rigid interview style and try to align your answers closely with the interviewer’s expectations, even if it limits creative thinking.

7

Company Name: Lenskart

Position: Product Manager

Application Process: Applied via a job portal in August 2023.

Interview Rounds:

  • Round 1 - Resume Shortlist:

    • Questions Asked: N/A (Resume screening round)
    • Your Approach: Ensured my resume was crisp and highlighted relevant experiences.
    • Outcome: Shortlisted for the next round.

  • Round 2 - One-on-one Round:

    • Questions Asked:
      1. Tell me about your previous experiences.
      2. Best feature release that you owned.
    • Your Approach: Focused on articulating my past roles and the impact of the feature I owned.
    • Outcome: Advanced to the assignment round.

  • Round 3 - Assignment Round:

    • Task: Increase app conversions and drive new user acquisition.
    • Your Approach: Analyzed the problem, proposed actionable strategies, and presented a detailed plan.
    • Outcome: Despite positive feedback from top product professionals, the Lenskart executive deemed it “not up to the mark.”

Preparation Tips:

  • Be prepared for rigorous evaluation, even if you come from a reputable product company.
  • Focus on demonstrating your ability to handle “hustle,” as this seems to be a key criterion for Lenskart.

Conclusion:
The interview process was thorough, but the feedback was disappointing. It seems Lenskart values a specific type of “hustle” that may not align with experiences from larger product companies. My advice: if you’re considering Lenskart, be ready to prove your adaptability and resilience, but also weigh whether their expectations match your career goals.

8

Company Name: Lenskart

Position: Product Manager

Location: [Not specified]

Application Process: [Not specified]

Interview Rounds:

  • Round 1 - Initial Interview:

  • Questions Asked: [Details not provided]

  • Your Approach: [Details not provided]

  • Outcome: Positive feedback received.

  • Round 2 - Assignment Round:

  • Questions Asked: An assignment was shared by HR as the “final round.”

  • Your Approach: Submitted the assignment solution.

  • Outcome: Positive feedback received, but another discussion was requested.

  • Round 3 - Discussion Round:

  • Questions Asked: Behavioral questions were asked.

  • Your Approach: Answered the questions confidently.

  • Outcome: Positive feedback shared, but no offer was extended.

  • Round 4 - Final Interview:

  • Questions Asked: Behavioral questions only.

  • Your Approach: [Details not provided]

  • Outcome: Received a regret mail after 5 days with no feedback.

Conclusion:

The overall experience was frustrating due to the lack of clarity in the interview process and the absence of constructive feedback after rejection. The HR team seemed unaware of the process, leading to confusion about the number of rounds. Future candidates should clarify the interview stages upfront and request feedback proactively. Despite the positive feedback in each round, the final outcome was disappointing, highlighting the importance of transparency in hiring processes.

9

Company Name: Lenskart

Position: Product Manager

Location: Hyderabad (via Indian School of Business - ISB)

Application Process: Applied through campus placement at ISB Hyderabad.

Interview Rounds:

  • Round 1 - Product Management Round:

    • Questions Asked:
      1. Uber wants to design a Subscription Service. What will your key areas of consideration be, and how will you price it? Also, design the algorithm/logic for matching drivers. What administrative considerations would you take into account?
    • Your Approach: Focused on breaking down the problem into key components like customer segmentation, pricing tiers, driver incentives, and operational logistics. Emphasized data-driven decision-making and scalability.
    • Outcome: The interviewer was very analytical and focused on the thought process. It felt like a rigorous problem-solving exercise.

  • Round 2 - Product Management Round:

    • Questions Asked:
      1. Discussion about a common startup we were both associated with.
      2. How would you present and differentiate your idea if there are 3 other PMs with equally strong ideas in the room?
      3. What’s your leadership style? Would you directly approach senior leaders with your ideas?
      4. Describe a time you disagreed with your supervisor. How did you handle it, and would you do anything differently now?
      5. List parameters to design a restaurant recommendation algorithm for Swiggy.
    • Your Approach: For the idea differentiation question, highlighted the importance of data, user feedback, and business impact. For leadership style, balanced assertiveness with collaboration. Shared a real conflict example and reflected on learnings. For the Swiggy question, focused on user behavior, cuisine preferences, and location-based factors.
    • Outcome: The interviewer was friendly and valued structured thinking and rationale behind decisions. The round lasted about 1.5 hours.

  • Round 3 - Product Management Round:

    • Questions Asked:
      1. List all user modes/states of a prospect Swiggy customer about to order food.
      2. Design the Menu page for restaurants on Swiggy.
      3. How would you display offers?
      4. How would you educate a new user about top-selling items?
      5. How would your design handle price-cuts and discounts?
      6. Redesign Swiggy’s home page, critiquing and suggesting changes with rationale.
    • Your Approach: Focused on user empathy, intuitive design, and data-backed decisions. For the menu page, prioritized clarity and personalization. For offers, suggested dynamic placement based on user behavior.
    • Outcome: The panel was conversational and focused on customer empathy and product sense. The round lasted about 1.5 hours.

Preparation Tips:

  • Round 1: Practice structured problem-solving for product design questions. Focus on breaking down complex problems into actionable steps.
  • Round 2: Be ready to discuss leadership and conflict resolution. Prepare to defend your ideas with data and logic.
  • Round 3: Brush up on UI/UX principles and customer journey mapping. Practice critiquing and redesigning existing products.

Conclusion:
Overall, the interview process was intense but rewarding. The key takeaways were the importance of structured thinking, customer empathy, and the ability to articulate rationale clearly. For future candidates, I’d recommend practicing real-world product scenarios and being prepared for deep dives into design and strategy.

10

Company Name: Lenskart

Position: Product Manager

Location: Hyderabad (via Indian School of Business - ISB)

Application Process: Applied through campus placement at Indian School of Business (ISB), Hyderabad.

Interview Rounds:

  • Round 1 - Product Management Round:

    • Questions Asked:
      • Uber wants to design a Subscription Service. What will your key areas of consideration be, and how will you price it? Also, design the algorithm/logic for matching drivers. What are the various administrative considerations you’ll have to consider?
    • Your Approach: Focused on breaking down the problem into key areas like customer segmentation, pricing tiers, driver incentives, and administrative logistics. Used a structured approach to outline the subscription model and matching algorithm.
    • Outcome: Passed to the next round. The interviewer was very focused on the thought process and approach.

  • Round 2 - Product Management Round:

    • Questions Asked:
      1. Discussion about a common startup both the interviewer and I were associated with.
      2. How would you present and differentiate your idea if there are 3 other product managers with equally strong ideas?
      3. What’s your leadership style? Would you directly approach a senior leader with an idea?
      4. Describe a time you faced a disagreement with your supervisor and how you handled it.
      5. List parameters to design a restaurant recommendation algorithm for Swiggy.
    • Your Approach: Emphasized structured thinking, rationale behind decisions, and leadership adaptability. For the disagreement question, highlighted conflict resolution skills and learning.
    • Outcome: Advanced to the next round. The interviewer was very engaging and valued rationale and structure.

  • Round 3 - Product Management Round:

    • Questions Asked:
      1. List all user modes/states of a prospect Swiggy customer about to order food.
      2. Design the Menu page for restaurants on Swiggy.
      3. How would you display offers?
      4. How would you educate a new user about top-selling items?
      5. How would your design handle price-cuts and discounts?
      6. Redesign the home page of Swiggy with rationale for changes.
    • Your Approach: Focused on user empathy, design principles, and practical implementation. Critiqued existing designs and suggested improvements with clear reasoning.
    • Outcome: The panel was very conversational and focused on customer empathy and product sense.

Preparation Tips:

  • Round 1: The interviewer was very analytical and focused on problem-solving. Practice structuring your thoughts clearly.
  • Round 2: Be prepared for leadership and conflict-resolution questions. The interviewer valued rationale and structured thinking.
  • Round 3: Focus on user-centric design and practical implementation. The panel was friendly but thorough in evaluating product sense.

Conclusion:
Overall, the interview process was rigorous but rewarding. The key takeaways were the importance of structured thinking, customer empathy, and the ability to articulate rationale clearly. For future candidates, I’d recommend practicing case studies and being prepared for deep dives into product design and user experience.

11

Company Name: Lenskart

Position: Product Manager

Location: Indian School of Business (ISB), Hyderabad

Application Process: Applied via campus placement at Indian School of Business (ISB), Hyderabad.

Interview Rounds:

  • Round 1 - Product Management Round:

    • Questions Asked:
      • Uber wants to design a Subscription Service. What will your key areas of consideration be, and how will you price it? Also, design the algorithm/logic for matching drivers. What are the various administrative considerations you’ll have to consider?
    • Your Approach: Focused on breaking down the problem into key areas like customer segmentation, pricing models, driver incentives, and administrative logistics. Emphasized a structured thought process and clear rationale for each decision.
    • Outcome: Passed the round. The interviewer was very focused on the approach and thought process, with no emphasis on small talk.

  • Round 2 - Product Management Round:

    • Questions Asked:
      1. Discussion about a common startup both the interviewer and I were associated with.
      2. How to present and differentiate your idea among 3 other product managers with equally strong ideas.
      3. Leadership style: Would you directly approach a senior leader with an idea?
      4. Describe a time you disagreed with your supervisor and how you handled it.
      5. Parameters to evaluate for designing a restaurant recommendation algorithm for Swiggy.
    • Your Approach: For the idea differentiation question, highlighted the importance of data-backed reasoning and customer-centricity. For leadership style, balanced assertiveness with collaboration. The conflict question was answered with a focus on constructive resolution.
    • Outcome: The interviewer was friendly and valued structured thinking and rationale behind decisions.

  • Round 3 - Product Management Round:

    • Questions Asked:
      1. List all user modes/states of a prospect Swiggy customer about to order food.
      2. Design the menu page for restaurants on Swiggy.
      3. How to display offers.
      4. Educate a new user about top-selling items.
      5. Incorporate price-cuts and discounts into the design.
      6. Redesign Swiggy’s home page with rationale for changes.
    • Your Approach: Focused on user empathy, design sense, and product intuition. For the menu page, emphasized clarity and ease of navigation. For offers and discounts, highlighted visibility and user engagement.
    • Outcome: The panel was conversational and focused on customer empathy and design sense.

Preparation Tips:

  • Round 1: Focus on structured problem-solving and clear articulation of your thought process.
  • Round 2: Be prepared for behavioral questions and scenarios that test your leadership and conflict-resolution skills.
  • Round 3: Brush up on product design principles and customer empathy. Practice designing features for real-world apps like Swiggy.

Conclusion:
Overall, the interview process was rigorous but insightful. The key takeaways were the importance of structured thinking, customer empathy, and the ability to articulate your rationale clearly. For future candidates, I’d recommend practicing real-world product design problems and being prepared for both technical and behavioral questions.

12

Company Name: Lenskart

Position: Product Manager

Location: Indian School of Business (ISB), Hyderabad

Application Process: Applied via campus placement at Indian School of Business (ISB), Hyderabad.

Interview Rounds:

  • Round 1 - Product Management Round:

    • Questions Asked:
      • Uber wants to design a Subscription Service. What will your key areas of consideration be, and how will you price it? Also, design the algorithm/logic for matching drivers. What are the various administrative considerations you’ll have to consider?
    • Your Approach: Focused on breaking down the problem into key areas like customer segmentation, pricing tiers, driver incentives, and administrative logistics. Proposed a dynamic pricing model and an algorithm prioritizing driver availability and customer demand.
    • Outcome: Advanced to the next round. The interviewer was very analytical and focused on the thought process.

  • Round 2 - Product Management Round:

    • Questions Asked:
      1. Discussion about a common startup both the interviewer and I were associated with.
      2. How to present and differentiate your idea among 3 other product managers with equally strong ideas.
      3. Leadership style preference—directly approaching senior leaders or not.
      4. Handling disagreements with supervisors and lessons learned.
      5. Parameters to evaluate for designing Swiggy’s restaurant recommendation algorithm.
    • Your Approach: Emphasized structured thinking, rationale behind decisions, and customer-centricity. For the leadership question, highlighted adaptability based on the situation.
    • Outcome: Progressed to the next round. The interviewer was friendly and valued rationale and structure.

  • Round 3 - Product Management Round:

    • Questions Asked:
      1. User modes/states of a prospect Swiggy customer about to order food.
      2. Design the Menu page for restaurants on Swiggy.
      3. Displaying offers effectively.
      4. Educating new users about top-selling items.
      5. Handling price-cuts and discounts in the design.
      6. Redesigning Swiggy’s home page with rationale for changes.
    • Your Approach: Focused on user empathy, intuitive design, and clear communication. Proposed iterative testing for the menu page and dynamic placement for offers.
    • Outcome: The panel was conversational and appreciated customer-centric thinking.

Preparation Tips:

  • Round 1: Focus on structured problem-solving and clear articulation of thought processes.
  • Round 2: Be prepared for behavioral questions and scenarios requiring rationale-driven answers.
  • Round 3: Emphasize user empathy and practical design solutions. Mock interviews with peers can help refine communication.

Conclusion:
Overall, the interview process was rigorous but insightful. The key takeaways were the importance of structured thinking, customer empathy, and adaptability. For future candidates, I’d recommend practicing case studies and behavioral questions thoroughly. The interviewers valued clarity, rationale, and a user-first approach.