Application Process: Applied through campus placement.
Interview Rounds:
Round 1 - Online Assessment:
Questions Asked:
30 Aptitude MCQs
30 Theory questions (DBMS, OOPS, and other basics)
2 SQL queries
1 NoSQL query
1 Java programming question
Your Approach: Focused on revising core concepts of DBMS and OOPS beforehand. Practiced SQL and NoSQL queries to ensure familiarity. For the Java question, I ensured my logic was clear and code was syntactically correct.
Outcome: Cleared the round successfully.
Round 2 - Technical Interview:
Questions Asked:
Detailed questions about my minor project
SQL queries for specific outputs
DBMS-related questions
Your Approach: Prepared a thorough explanation of my minor project, highlighting my contributions and challenges faced. For SQL queries, I took my time to understand the requirements before writing the queries.
Outcome: Advanced to the next round.
Round 3 - Technical + Managerial Interview:
Questions Asked:
Questions about myself (background, interests, etc.)
Asked to explain my approach to a given problem statement
Your Approach: Kept my introduction concise and relevant. For the problem statement, I broke it down into smaller parts and explained my thought process clearly.
Outcome: Moved forward to the final round.
Round 4 - HR Round:
Questions Asked:
Asked about my overall experience during the interview process
Your Approach: Shared honest feedback and expressed enthusiasm for the role.
Outcome: Received positive feedback and was selected for the internship.
Preparation Tips:
Revise core concepts of DBMS, OOPS, and SQL thoroughly.
Practice writing SQL and NoSQL queries for different scenarios.
Be prepared to discuss your projects in detail, focusing on your role and learnings.
For managerial rounds, practice structuring your thoughts clearly when explaining problem-solving approaches.
Conclusion:
Overall, the interview process was smooth and well-structured. I felt well-prepared for the technical rounds, but I could have practiced more problem-solving scenarios for the managerial round. My advice to future candidates is to stay calm, be confident, and ensure you understand the basics thoroughly.
Application Process: I applied for the internship through the company’s career portal. The process was straightforward, and I received a call for the interview after my application was shortlisted.
Interview Rounds:
Round 1 - Technical Interview:
Questions Asked: The interviewer focused on data structures and algorithms (DSA). Some of the questions included:
Explain the difference between an array and a linked list.
Write a function to reverse a linked list.
Discuss the time complexity of common sorting algorithms.
Your Approach: I was initially nervous, but the interviewer was very polite and made me feel comfortable. I took my time to think through the problems and explained my thought process clearly. For the coding question, I wrote a step-by-step solution and verified it with an example.
Outcome: The round went well, and I received positive feedback on my problem-solving approach.
Preparation Tips:
Focus on strengthening your DSA fundamentals, especially linked lists, arrays, and sorting algorithms.
Practice explaining your thought process while solving problems, as clarity is key.
Stay calm and composed during the interview; it helps in thinking clearly.
Conclusion:
Overall, it was a great learning experience. The interviewer was supportive, and the questions were fair. I realized the importance of clear communication and thorough preparation. For future candidates, I’d recommend practicing coding problems regularly and staying confident during the interview.
Application Process: [Brief description of how the student applied, e.g., campus placement, online application, referral]
Interview Rounds:
Round 1 - Technical Interview:
Questions Asked:
Can you describe your experience with project management methodologies like Agile, Scrum, or Waterfall?
How do you handle project risks and ensure timely delivery?
Explain a technical project you managed and the challenges you faced.
Your Approach:
I discussed my hands-on experience with Agile and Scrum, highlighting a past project where I successfully mitigated risks.
I provided a detailed example of a technical project, focusing on problem-solving and stakeholder communication.
Outcome: Passed to the next round.
Round 2 - Behavioral Interview:
Questions Asked:
Describe a time when you had to manage conflicting priorities among stakeholders.
How do you ensure effective communication within a project team?
Share an example of how you handled a project that was behind schedule.
Your Approach:
I used the STAR method to structure my answers, emphasizing collaboration and adaptability.
I shared specific instances where I improved team communication and resolved scheduling issues.
Outcome: Received positive feedback and advanced to the final round.
Round 3 - HR Interview:
Questions Asked:
Why do you want to intern at Maersk?
How do you align with Maersk’s values and culture?
What are your long-term career goals?
Your Approach:
I connected my passion for project management with Maersk’s global impact and innovative projects.
I highlighted my adaptability and eagerness to learn, aligning with the company’s culture.
Outcome: Received an offer for the internship.
Preparation Tips:
Brush up on project management methodologies and tools.
Practice behavioral questions using the STAR method.
Research Maersk’s projects and values to tailor your answers.
Conclusion:
The interview process was thorough but rewarding. I felt well-prepared for the technical and behavioral rounds, but I could have practiced more real-time problem-solving scenarios. My advice to future candidates is to focus on clear communication and relatable examples. Good luck!
Application Process: I applied through the campus placement process. The initial step was a written test followed by technical and group discussion rounds.
Interview Rounds:
Round 1 - Written Test:
Questions Asked: The test had four sections: Java, SQL, coding, and an essay. Each section had 20 questions. There was also one easy-level coding problem and one essay to write.
Your Approach: I focused on brushing up my Java and SQL basics beforehand. For the coding problem, I practiced simple algorithms to ensure I could solve it quickly. The essay was about a general topic, so I structured my thoughts clearly.
Outcome: I cleared this round and moved on to the technical interviews.
Round 2 - Technical Round 1:
Questions Asked: Questions covered React, Java, Python, and APIs. The interviewer asked about my projects and how I implemented certain features.
Your Approach: I discussed my projects in detail, emphasizing my hands-on experience with React and Java. For API-related questions, I explained REST principles and gave examples from my work.
Outcome: The round went well, and I advanced to the next technical round.
Round 3 - Technical Round 2:
Questions Asked: This round focused on puzzles and SQL. The puzzles tested logical thinking, and the SQL questions involved writing queries for given scenarios.
Your Approach: I took my time to understand the puzzles before attempting solutions. For SQL, I recalled common patterns and optimized my queries.
Outcome: I performed decently and was selected for the group discussion round.
Round 4 - Group Discussion:
Questions Asked: The topic was not specified, but it was a general discussion on a current industry trend.
Your Approach: I actively listened to others, contributed relevant points, and ensured my arguments were clear and concise.
Outcome: The round was collaborative, and I felt confident about my participation.
Preparation Tips:
Focus on core Java and SQL concepts, as they are heavily tested.
Practice easy to medium-level coding problems to build speed and accuracy.
Brush up on React and API basics if applying for roles involving web development.
For puzzles, practice logical reasoning problems from standard resources.
Group discussions require clarity of thought and good communication, so practice speaking on diverse topics.
Conclusion:
Overall, the interview process was well-structured and tested both technical and soft skills. I could have prepared more for the puzzles, but my strong technical foundation helped me through. My advice to future candidates is to balance preparation between technical knowledge and problem-solving skills, and to stay calm and confident during the process.
Application Process: Applied through campus placement.
Interview Rounds:
Round 1 - Written Test:
Questions Asked:
Java, SQL, and coding questions (20 questions each section).
One coding problem (easy level).
One essay question.
Your Approach: Focused on revising core Java and SQL concepts beforehand. For the coding problem, I ensured I understood the problem statement clearly before writing the solution. The essay was straightforward, so I structured my thoughts logically.
Outcome: Cleared the round successfully.
Round 2 - Technical Round 1:
Questions Asked:
React, Java, Python, and API-related questions.
Your Approach: I brushed up on React basics, Java OOPs concepts, and Python scripting. For APIs, I revised REST principles and common HTTP methods.
Outcome: Answered most questions confidently and moved to the next round.
Round 3 - Technical Round 2:
Questions Asked:
Puzzles and SQL queries.
Your Approach: Practiced puzzle-solving techniques beforehand. For SQL, I focused on joins, subqueries, and optimization.
Outcome: Performed well and advanced to the next stage.
Round 4 - Group Discussion:
Questions Asked: Topics were not disclosed beforehand.
Your Approach: Stayed calm, listened actively, and contributed relevant points without dominating the discussion.
Outcome: Cleared the round.
Preparation Tips:
Revise core concepts of Java, SQL, and React thoroughly.
Practice coding problems on platforms like LeetCode (easy to medium level).
For puzzles, try solving standard ones to improve logical thinking.
Group discussions require clarity of thought and teamwork—practice with peers.
Conclusion:
Overall, the interview process was smooth and well-structured. I felt prepared for most rounds, but I could have practiced more puzzles to improve my speed. My advice to future candidates is to focus on fundamentals and stay confident during the interviews.
Application Process: [Brief description of how the student applied, e.g., campus placement, online application, referral]
Interview Rounds:
Round 1 - Technical Interview:
Questions Asked:
Can you describe your experience with project management methodologies like Agile or Scrum?
How would you handle a situation where a project is behind schedule?
Explain a technical project you have worked on and your role in it.
Your Approach:
I highlighted my coursework and personal projects that involved Agile methodologies.
For the scheduling question, I discussed prioritization and stakeholder communication.
I walked through a recent project, emphasizing my contributions and learnings.
Outcome: Passed to the next round.
Round 2 - Behavioral Interview:
Questions Asked:
Describe a time you had to resolve a conflict within a team.
How do you handle feedback from stakeholders?
What motivates you to work in project management?
Your Approach:
I shared a specific example of a team conflict and how I mediated it.
I emphasized my openness to feedback and how I use it to improve.
I talked about my passion for problem-solving and teamwork.
Outcome: Received positive feedback and moved to the final round.
Round 3 - HR Interview:
Questions Asked:
Why do you want to intern at Maersk?
Where do you see yourself in 5 years?
What are your salary expectations?
Your Approach:
I aligned my career goals with Maersk’s values and projects.
I kept my 5-year vision realistic and growth-oriented.
I researched industry standards for internships and provided a reasonable range.
Outcome: Received an offer for the internship.
Preparation Tips:
Brush up on Agile and Scrum methodologies.
Prepare STAR (Situation, Task, Action, Result) stories for behavioral questions.
Research Maersk’s recent projects and align your answers with their goals.
Conclusion:
The interview process was thorough but fair. I felt well-prepared for the technical and behavioral rounds, but I could have researched more about Maersk’s specific projects beforehand. My advice to future candidates is to practice articulating your experiences clearly and confidently. Good luck!
Application Process: Applied through the company’s internship portal.
Interview Rounds:
Round 1 - Online Assessment:
Questions Asked:
30 Aptitude MCQs
30 Theory Questions (DBMS, OOPS, and other basics)
2 SQL queries
1 NoSQL query
1 Java Programming question
Your Approach: Focused on revising core concepts of DBMS and OOPS, practiced SQL queries, and brushed up on Java basics. For aptitude, relied on logical reasoning and time management.
Outcome: Cleared the round successfully.
Round 2 - Technical Interview:
Questions Asked:
Detailed discussion on minor project
SQL queries for specific outputs
DBMS-related questions
Your Approach: Explained the project thoroughly, highlighting my contributions. For SQL queries, wrote optimized solutions and justified the logic. Answered DBMS questions with examples.
Outcome: Advanced to the next round.
Round 3 - Tech + Managerial Interview:
Questions Asked:
Questions about myself (background, interests, etc.)
Explained approach to a given problem statement
Your Approach: Presented myself confidently, linked my skills to the role. For the problem statement, broke it down into steps and proposed a logical solution.
Outcome: Moved forward to the final round.
Round 4 - HR Round:
Questions Asked:
Feedback on overall interview experience
Your Approach: Shared honest feedback and expressed enthusiasm for the role.
Outcome: Received positive feedback and awaited final results.
Preparation Tips:
Revise core CS subjects like DBMS and OOPS thoroughly.
Practice SQL and NoSQL queries for common scenarios.
Be prepared to discuss your projects in detail.
Work on problem-solving and logical reasoning for aptitude tests.
Conclusion:
The interview process was well-structured and tested both technical and managerial skills. I felt confident in my preparation, especially for the technical rounds. For future candidates, I’d recommend focusing on clarity in communication and practicing problem-solving under time constraints.