Company Name: Google
Position: Recruiter
Location: [Not specified]
Application Process: Applied through a referral, followed by coordination with a recruiter and a coordinator.
Interview Rounds:
-
Round 1 - Initial Screening:
-
Questions Asked: General introductory questions about background and experience.
-
Your Approach: Engaged openly and tried to establish rapport.
-
Outcome: Moved forward to the next rounds.
-
Round 2 - Panel Interviews (4 Conversations):
-
Questions Asked: Repetitive hypothetical questions about recruiting scenarios, creative solutions, and audience engagement.
-
Your Approach: Attempted to provide thoughtful answers but found the questions unoriginal and scripted.
-
Outcome: Felt the process lacked diversity and originality, leading to a negative experience.
Conclusion:
The interview process was disappointing due to the repetitive and scripted nature of the questions. While the interviewers were welcoming, the lack of originality in the questioning made it feel impersonal. Google’s People Operations should reconsider their interview strategy for recruiting roles to attract top talent effectively.
Company Name: Google
Position: Recruiter
Application Process: I was initially contacted by a sourcer, followed by a recruiter who conducted a brief phone screening. After clearing this, I was informed via email that I had been selected for an on-site interview. The recruiter scheduled the on-site, and on the day, a coordinator greeted me and outlined the interview schedule.
Interview Rounds:
Preparation Tips:
- Focus on practicing situational and hypothetical questions, as they dominated the interview.
- Work on structuring your thought process clearly, as Google emphasizes understanding how you think.
- Be prepared for questions that may seem unrelated to the role but are designed to assess your problem-solving skills.
Conclusion:
The interview was challenging, with a heavy focus on hypothetical scenarios rather than recruiting-specific questions. While I prepared extensively, the nature of the questions caught me off guard. If I could do it differently, I would spend more time practicing unconventional problem-solving questions. For future candidates, I’d advise preparing for a wide range of situational questions and not assuming the interview will be role-specific. Despite the outcome, it was a learning experience, though the lack of feedback was disappointing.
Company Name: Google
Position: Recruiter
Application Process: I was contacted by a sourcer who asked for my resume. After reviewing my resume, the sourcer scheduled me for a phone interview with a recruiter.
Interview Rounds:
Conclusion:
The experience was quite different from what I expected. The scripted nature of the interview made it feel less engaging, and I couldn’t shake the feeling that I might have been speaking to an AI. For future candidates, I’d advise preparing for very structured questions and keeping answers clear and to the point. It’s also worth noting that the process might feel less personal than other companies, so don’t be discouraged by that.
Company Name: Google
Position: Recruiter
Location: [Not specified]
Application Process: I was reached out to by one of Google’s sourcers via LinkedIn. Though I wasn’t actively looking for a job, I decided to proceed with the opportunity.
Interview Rounds:
-
Round 1 - Phone Interview (Recruiting Coordinator):
-
Questions Asked: General introductory questions about my background and interest in the role.
-
Your Approach: I kept my answers concise and professional, highlighting my relevant experience.
-
Outcome: Passed this round and moved forward.
-
Round 2 - Phone Interview (Recruiter):
-
Questions Asked: More in-depth questions about my recruiting experience and how I handle certain scenarios.
-
Your Approach: I provided specific examples from my past roles to demonstrate my skills.
-
Outcome: Passed this round and was invited for an onsite interview.
-
Round 3 - Onsite Interview:
-
Questions Asked: Varied questions about recruiting strategies, problem-solving, and team dynamics. Some questions were poorly worded or unexpected.
-
Your Approach: I tried to stay composed and answer as best as I could, even when the questions were unclear.
-
Outcome: Mixed feelings—some interviews went well, others felt rushed or awkward. No feedback received yet.
Preparation Tips:
- My recruiter prepped me for the onsite with potential questions and advice, which was helpful.
- Researching Google’s culture and People Ops beforehand would have been beneficial.
Conclusion:
The overall experience was mixed. While the initial phone interviews were smooth, the onsite was disorganized and left a negative impression. The lack of follow-up from the recruiter was unprofessional. Even if an offer comes through, I likely won’t accept it due to the poor experience.
Company Name: Google
Position: Recruiter
Location: [Not specified]
Application Process: [Not specified]
Interview Rounds:
-
Round 1 - Initial Interaction:
- Questions Asked: [Not specified]
- Your Approach: I engaged with multiple people during the process, which consisted of three stages, each lasting 30 minutes.
- Outcome: I noticed a lack of diversity and representation of POC, which was shocking for a company like Google.
-
Round 2 - Team Interaction:
- Questions Asked: [Not specified]
- Your Approach: During this round, a woman on the team seemed to take issue with me being a Black female, making references to my “culture” being different.
- Outcome: The interaction felt uncomfortable and unwelcoming.
-
Round 3 - Leadership Interaction:
- Questions Asked: [Not specified]
- Your Approach: The team leader, a man, was rude and condescending during our interaction.
- Outcome: This round solidified my decision not to pursue the role further.
Conclusion:
My overall experience with Google was disappointing due to the lack of inclusivity and professionalism displayed during the interview process. The interactions with the team and leadership left me feeling undervalued and unwelcome. I’m grateful to have found a better opportunity with Cisco, where I feel more respected and valued. My advice to future candidates is to prioritize companies that align with their values and demonstrate genuine inclusivity in their culture.
Company Name: Google
Position: Recruiter
Application Process: I was contacted by a sourcer about an opportunity at LinkedIn as a passive candidate. After initial contact, I was passed to a Recruiter for further steps.
Interview Rounds:
-
Round 1 - Recruiter Phone Screen:
- Questions Asked: Confirmed my current employment status, asked about gaps in my employment, and whether I needed work sponsorship.
- Your Approach: Since the call felt scripted and impersonal, I answered straightforwardly without much elaboration.
- Outcome: I was invited to an OS Loop (On-Site Interview Loop).
-
Round 2 - Recruiter Prep Call:
- Questions Asked: Generic advice like looking up interviewers on LinkedIn, preparing examples, and dressing appropriately.
- Your Approach: The call was rushed and scripted, so I relied on my own research and preparation methods.
- Outcome: Proceeded to the OS Loop interviews.
-
Round 3 - OS Loop Interviews:
- Questions Asked: A mix of behavioral and hypothetical questions with follow-ups. Some interviewers repeated questions or seemed disengaged.
- Your Approach: I answered honestly and tried to connect with the interviewers, though one was particularly disinterested.
- Outcome: The experience left me underwhelmed, and I decided not to pursue the opportunity further.
Preparation Tips:
- Rely on your own research and preparation methods, especially if recruiter guidance feels generic.
- Prepare for behavioral and hypothetical questions, as they were a significant part of the interview.
- Look up your interviewers on LinkedIn to get a sense of their background.
Conclusion:
Overall, the interview process with Google was disappointing due to the lack of personalization and enthusiasm from the recruiters and some interviewers. While there were some pros like the free-flowing work environment and benefits, the cons outweighed them for me. The experience reinforced that company culture and recruiter interactions play a huge role in candidate experience. If you’re considering Google, ensure you align with their values and expectations, and don’t hesitate to trust your gut if something feels off.
Company Name: Google
Position: Recruiter
Location: Austin, TX
Application Process:
The interview process was initiated after being contacted by Google, involving coordination with multiple people for planning.
Interview Rounds:
- Round 1 - Interview:
- Questions Asked: The interview process was described as long, extensive, and impersonal. The interviewers typed responses without making eye contact or engaging in small talk.
- Your Approach: Despite the sterile environment, I remained professional and focused on answering the questions as clearly as possible.
- Outcome: The experience left me questioning the suitability of the process for candidates.
Conclusion:
The overall experience was disappointing due to the impersonal and robotic nature of the interview. The lack of follow-up for three weeks added to the frustration. I wouldn’t recommend this process for candidates, as it lacks the personal touch and efficiency one would expect from a company like Google.
Company Name: Google
Position: Recruiter (11-month contract)
Location: London
Application Process: Applied through an online application or referral (specific details not provided).
Interview Rounds:
- Round 1 - Recruiter Screening Call:
- Questions Asked: The interview was intended to be a screening call with a recruiter, but the questions or details of the discussion were not shared due to the recruiter’s abrupt behavior.
- Your Approach: The candidate was prepared for a professional discussion but encountered a recruiter who seemed disinterested and rushed.
- Outcome: The call was cut short, and the recruiter appeared dismissive. The candidate did not proceed further in the process.
Conclusion:
The overall experience was disappointing due to the unprofessional behavior of the recruiter. While working at Google might look impressive on a CV, the candidate questioned whether the treatment of contractors justified the opportunity. The advice for future candidates would be to weigh the pros and cons of contract roles at large companies and be prepared for variability in interview experiences.
Company Name: Google
Position: Recruiter
Location: [Not specified]
Application Process: I applied online for the role and was contacted within a few days to set up an initial phone call with a recruiter.
Interview Rounds:
-
Round 1 - Initial Recruiter Call:
-
Questions Asked: The recruiter discussed my background and what it was like to work on the recruiting team at Google. She also mentioned that they had later-stage candidates in the pipeline and might not continue the process with other candidates.
-
Your Approach: I appreciated the recruiter’s transparency and used the opportunity to ask questions about the role and the team culture.
-
Outcome: The process was paused as they were focusing on later-stage candidates.
Conclusion:
Overall, it was a positive and transparent experience. The recruiter was professional and upfront about the situation, which I valued. For future candidates, I’d recommend being prepared to discuss your background and asking insightful questions about the role, even if the process doesn’t move forward.
Company Name: Google
Position: Recruiter
Application Process: Applied through an online application process.
Interview Rounds:
Conclusion:
The interview process was smooth and well-organized. The questions were challenging but fair, and the feedback was prompt. I would advise future candidates to prepare for hypothetical scenarios and practice structuring their answers clearly. Overall, a great learning experience!
Company Name: Google
Position: Recruiter
Application Process: I received a call from one of their recruiters to schedule a phone interview/screen.
Interview Rounds:
- Round 1 - Phone Screen:
- Questions Asked: The recruiter asked scripted questions during the call.
- Your Approach: I answered the questions as clearly and professionally as possible.
- Outcome: The recruiter did not engage in any follow-up conversation and simply moved to the next question. After the last question, they read a script about next steps and ended the call.
Conclusion:
The experience felt impersonal and robotic, with no real interaction or engagement from the recruiter. It was disappointing, especially coming from a company like Google. For future candidates, I’d advise preparing for scripted questions but also hoping for a more human touch in the process.
Company Name: Google
Position: Recruiter
Location: [Location not specified]
Application Process: I applied through an online application process. The initial communication was very professional, and I felt comfortable right from the start.
Interview Rounds:
- Round 1 - Phone Screening:
- Questions Asked: The recruiter made me feel at ease and asked general questions about my background, experience, and interest in the role.
- Your Approach: I answered honestly and confidently, focusing on my relevant skills and enthusiasm for the position.
- Outcome: The recruiter was very professional, and I received a follow-up communication a few days later.
Conclusion:
The overall experience was positive, and the recruiter was very professional and welcoming. I would advise future candidates to be themselves and communicate clearly about their skills and interests.
Company Name: Google
Position: Recruiter
Application Process: The process was very lean, with enough information provided on how to prepare but not too detailed on what to expect. Recruiters shared a general interview prep form to help candidates get ready.
Interview Rounds:
Preparation Tips:
- Review your resume in detail and be ready to discuss every aspect of it.
- Practice situational questions by thinking of real-life scenarios you’ve encountered or hypothetical ones.
- Focus on clear and concise communication, as recruiters value this highly.
Conclusion:
Overall, the interview process was smooth and well-structured. The recruiters were supportive and made the experience less daunting. I would advise future candidates to prepare thoroughly but also stay calm and confident during the interviews. Being genuine and articulate about your experiences goes a long way!
Company Name: Google
Position: Recruiter
Application Process: I applied online for the Recruiter role at Google. The process moved quickly, and I was scheduled for an initial phone interview shortly after submitting my application.
Interview Rounds:
- Round 1 - Phone Interview:
- Questions Asked: The interviewer was friendly and transparent, mentioning upfront that they were in later stages with another candidate. The questions revolved around my experience in recruitment, my approach to sourcing candidates, and how I handle hiring challenges.
- Your Approach: I focused on highlighting my relevant experience, sharing specific examples of successful recruitment strategies I’ve used in the past. I also emphasized my adaptability and problem-solving skills in hiring scenarios.
- Outcome: The interviewer provided positive feedback on my responses but noted that they were further along with another candidate. I appreciated the transparency and the opportunity to learn more about the role.
Conclusion:
Overall, the experience was positive despite not moving forward in the process. The interviewer’s transparency was refreshing, and it gave me a clear understanding of where I stood. For future candidates, I’d recommend being prepared to discuss specific recruitment strategies and examples from your experience, as Google values practical insights and adaptability in their recruiters.
Company Name: Google
Position: Recruiter
Location: New York (NY Office)
Application Process: Applied for the role, and the recruiter reached out to schedule an interview.
Interview Rounds:
- Round 1 - Recruiter Screening:
- Questions Asked:
- “Where are you located?”
- “This position is based out of California. Are you okay with relocating to California?”
- Your Approach: Answered honestly about my location and relocation preferences.
- Outcome: The recruiter ended the call after 3 minutes and mentioned they would keep my resume on file for future opportunities.
Conclusion:
The experience was disappointing, especially after rescheduling and preparing for the interview. The recruiter could have clarified the relocation requirement upfront via email to save time for both parties. For future candidates, it might be helpful to confirm all role details (like location) before committing to an interview to avoid similar situations.
Company Name: Google
Position: Recruiter
Location: [Location not specified]
Application Process: Applied through an online application process. The initial step involved a recruiter screening call to discuss the role and my background.
Interview Rounds:
Preparation Tips:
- Research Google’s hiring process and values thoroughly.
- Practice behavioral questions using the STAR method.
- Be ready to discuss your recruitment strategies and how they align with Google’s culture.
Conclusion:
Overall, the interview process was well-structured and engaging. I appreciated the flexibility of choosing between onsite and video interviews. If I could do anything differently, I would prepare more specific examples of my past recruitment successes to make my answers even stronger. For future candidates, I’d advise thorough preparation and staying authentic in your responses.
Company Name: Google
Position: Recruiter
Application Process: Applied through an online application process.
Interview Rounds:
Conclusion:
The interview process at Google for the Recruiter role was disappointing. The problem-solving round was unexpected and poorly conducted, with negative phrasing from the interviewer. Additionally, interactions with the Dublin office staff were cold and unhelpful. Even if offered the role, I would not have accepted due to the lack of candidate focus and uninspiring interviewers. My advice to future candidates is to be prepared for unconventional rounds and to assess whether the company culture aligns with their expectations.
Company Name: Google
Position: Recruiter
Application Process: I was approached by a recruiter for positions at Google. After an initial discussion, I spoke to another recruiter to explore potential roles. Later, another call was scheduled with a different recruiter.
Interview Rounds:
- Round 1 - Initial Recruiter Call:
- Questions Asked: The recruiter was interested in my background, particularly my experience in data metrics, numbers, and billings (given my ex-agency background).
- Your Approach: I shared my experiences openly but realized the role was heavily focused on metrics and numbers, which didn’t align with my preferences.
- Outcome: I decided the role wasn’t a good fit for me, as I prefer making a tangible impact, which is more common in startup environments.
Conclusion:
The process was straightforward, but the role’s focus on metrics and being a “number” in a large company didn’t resonate with me. If you’re someone who thrives in a fast-paced, impact-driven environment, this might not be the right fit. However, if you enjoy working with data and metrics in a structured setting, it could be a great opportunity.
Company Name: Google
Position: Recruiter
Location: [Not specified]
Application Process: The application process involved a pre-screen call, followed by two Google Hangout interviews, and concluded with an in-person interview loop.
Interview Rounds:
-
Round 1 - Pre-screen Call:
-
Questions Asked: General questions about my background, experience, and interest in the role.
-
Your Approach: I focused on highlighting my relevant experience and enthusiasm for the role.
-
Outcome: Advanced to the next round.
-
Round 2 - Google Hangout Interview 1:
-
Questions Asked: Behavioral and situational questions, along with some role-specific scenarios.
-
Your Approach: I used the STAR method to structure my answers and provided concrete examples from my past experiences.
-
Outcome: Moved forward to the next interview.
-
Round 3 - Google Hangout Interview 2:
-
Questions Asked: More in-depth behavioral questions and hypothetical scenarios related to recruiting challenges.
-
Your Approach: I emphasized problem-solving skills and adaptability, drawing parallels to past challenges I’ve faced.
-
Outcome: Advanced to the final in-person interview loop.
-
Round 4 - In-Person Interview Loop:
-
Questions Asked: A mix of behavioral, situational, and role-specific questions, including how I would handle certain recruiting scenarios.
-
Your Approach: I remained composed, used data-driven examples where possible, and tried to showcase my ability to think critically.
-
Outcome: The process concluded here, but the final decision was delayed due to the committee-based hiring approach.
Preparation Tips:
- Research the company’s hiring practices and culture thoroughly.
- Practice behavioral questions using the STAR method.
- Be prepared for role-specific scenarios and hypothetical challenges.
Conclusion:
The interview process was rigorous and highlighted Google’s emphasis on committee-based decisions. While the technical aspects of the interviews were manageable, the cultural vibe felt exclusive at times. For future candidates, I’d advise patience due to the lengthy decision-making process and to prepare thoroughly for behavioral and situational questions.
Company Name: Google
Position: Recruiter
Application Process: Applied through the company’s career portal. The process was streamlined, and I received timely updates from the recruitment team.
Interview Rounds:
-
Round 1 - Initial Screening:
-
Questions Asked: General questions about my background, interest in the role, and understanding of Google’s culture.
-
Your Approach: I focused on aligning my experience with the recruiter role and emphasized my problem-solving and leadership skills.
-
Outcome: Passed to the next round.
-
Round 2 - Problem-Solving Assessment:
-
Questions Asked: Scenario-based questions to test my problem-solving abilities and how I handle challenges in a recruitment setting.
-
Your Approach: I used the STAR method to structure my answers and provided clear examples from my past experiences.
-
Outcome: Advanced to the next stage.
-
Round 3 - Leadership Evaluation:
-
Questions Asked: Questions about leadership style, team collaboration, and handling conflicts.
-
Your Approach: I highlighted my leadership experiences and how I foster teamwork and resolve conflicts.
-
Outcome: Moved forward in the process.
-
Round 4 - Cultural Fit Interview:
-
Questions Asked: Questions about alignment with Google’s values, adaptability, and how I contribute to a positive work environment.
-
Your Approach: I researched Google’s core values beforehand and tailored my responses to reflect them.
-
Outcome: Progressed to the final round.
-
Round 5 - Role-Related Knowledge Test:
-
Questions Asked: Technical questions about recruitment strategies, candidate evaluation, and industry trends.
-
Your Approach: I relied on my expertise and recent industry knowledge to answer confidently.
-
Outcome: Successfully completed the interview process.
Preparation Tips:
- Research Google’s culture and values thoroughly.
- Practice the STAR method for behavioral questions.
- Stay updated on recruitment trends and best practices.
- Prepare examples of leadership and problem-solving from your past roles.
Conclusion:
The interview process was rigorous but well-structured, with clear communication from the recruiters. I appreciated the detailed briefings before and after each stage. My advice to future candidates is to prepare extensively for each aspect of the role, from problem-solving to cultural fit, and to leverage your recruiter’s guidance throughout the process.